Hanjo Hamann / Publications


The following selection of twelve academic writings accepted for publication is sorted from newest to oldest.
100 % of these texts are Open Access: 67  % Gold (freely available online), 33  % Green (freely accessible below).

12 … Evidence-Based Jurisprudence meets Legal Linguistics. Unlikely Blends Made in Germany, 43 Brigham Young University Law Review 1473–1501 (2018), jointly with Friedemann Vogel

11 … Open Access in German Legal Academia. Challenges and Perspectives, Blog Droit Européen (2017/10/25)

10 … The Fabric of Language and Law. Towards an International Research Network for Computer Assisted Legal Linguistics (CAL²), 6 International Journal of Language & Law 101–109 (2017), jointly with Friedemann Vogel

9 … Computer-Assisted Legal Linguistics. Corpus Analysis as a New Tool for Legal Studies, 42 Law & Social Inquiry 1–24 (2017), jointly with Friedemann Vogel / Isabelle Gauer

8 … Computer Assisted Legal Linguistics (CAL²), in Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2016: The Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference 195–198 (Bex/Villata ed., 2016), jointly with Friedemann Vogel / Isabelle Gauer

7 … The Hog Cycle of Law Professors. An Econometric Time Series Analysis of the Entry-level Job Market in Legal Academia, 11 PLoS ONE 1–22 (e0159815 & e0168041/2016), jointly with Christoph Engel

6 … “Begin at the beginning”. Lawyers and Linguists Together in Wonderland, 3 The Winnower 1–9 (4919/2016), jointly with Friedemann Vogel / Dieter Stein / Andreas Abegg / Łucja Biel / Lawrence M. Solan

5 … Cui Bono, Benefit Corporation? An Experiment Inspired by Social Enterprise Legislation in Germany and the US, 11 Review of Law & Economics 79–110 (2015), jointly with Sven Fischer / Sebastian J. Goerg

4 … Bovigus. Revisiting a Legal Discovery, 52 Journal of Irreproducible Results 29–31 (4/2014)

3 … Unpacking the Board. A Comparative and Empirical Perspective on Groups in Corporate Decision-Making, 11 Berkeley Business Law Journal 1–54 (2014)

Collegial decision-making is relevant for a host of legal questions and in particular for corporate law. What do we know about its empirical effects? Less than we could. As of yet, pertinent review articles usually (1) assume rather than analyze how much the law actually mandates collegial decision-making, (2) rely mostly on “classical” studies of decision-making or those from behavioral economics, while underrating a century’s worth of previous empirical research, and (3) review the evidence anecdotally with little regard for the robustness of each study’s findings. As a consequence, scholars from corporate law and economics even today rely on theories and evidence which were disproved years ago. The present paper is a remedy. It combines a thorough comparative analysis of corporate statutes with a comprehensive research of empirical evidence, resulting in an assessment of the robust empirical effects of collegial decision-making. Finding that groups tend to deteriorate decision quality and exacerbate cognitive biases, this paper calls upon corporate law to design institutional remedies. Knowing more about these empirical effects will help scholars to identify and eliminate faulty arguments, and thereby improve governance policy and the legal discourse as a whole.

2 … Student Participation in Legal Education in Germany and Europe, 10 German Law Journal 1095–1112 (2009), jointly with Lisa Rieder

1 … The Importance of Intercultural Competence in the Development of Successful International Businesses, Social Science Research Network (2004/8/1)