Publikationen

10 … Unsichtbare Hermeneutiken. Die schwierige Wahlverwandtschaft von Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften
RW 13 (2022), S. 299–317 … DOI: 10.5771/1868-8098-2022-2-299

9 … K Is for Contract―Why Is It, Though? A K’s Study on the Origins, Persistence and Propagation of Legal Konventions
MLR Headnotes 106 (2022), S. 362–390

8 … Seven Years of Language & Law. Editors’ Progress Report on the Journal of the International Language & Law Association
JLL 8 (2019), S. 1–8, gemeinsam mit Friedemann Vogel … DOI: 10.14762/jll.2019.001

7 … Computer-Assisted Legal Linguistics. Corpus Analysis as a New Tool for Legal Studies
Law & Soc. Inq. 43 (2018), S. 1340–1363, gemeinsam mit Friedemann Vogel / Isabelle Gauer … DOI: 10.1111/lsi.12305

6 … Evidence-Based Jurisprudence meets Legal Linguistics. Unlikely Blends Made in Germany
BYU L. Rev. 43 (2018), S. 1473–1501, gemeinsam mit Friedemann Vogel … ISSN: 0360-151X

5 … [Normativität und Gerechtigkeit als emergente Sprachphänomene]. Rezension zu Claudia Woldt, Normativität als linguistische Schnittstelle
ARSP 104 (2018), S. 136–141 … DOI: 10.25162/arsp-2018-0008

4 … The Fabric of Language and Law. Towards an International Research Network for Computer Assisted Legal Linguistics (CAL²)
JLL 6 (2017), S. 101–109, gemeinsam mit Friedemann Vogel … DOI: 10.14762/jll.2017.101

3 … Die empirische Herangehensweise im Zivilrecht. Lebensnähe und Methodenehrlichkeit für die juristische Analytik?
AcP 217 (2017), S. 311–336, gemeinsam mit Leonard Hoeft … DOI: 10.1628/000389917X15002739282653

2 … “Begin at the beginning”. Lawyers and Linguists Together in Wonderland
Winnower 3 (2016), Nr. 4919, S. 1–9, gemeinsam mit Friedemann Vogel / Dieter Stein / Andreas Abegg / Łucja Biel / Lawrence M. Solan … DOI: 10.15200/winn.148184.43176 What do patterns in legal language tell us about power, policy and justice? This question was at the heart of a conference on “The Fabric of Language and Law: Discovering Patterns through Legal Corpus Linguistics”, convened in March 2016 by the international research group “Computer Assisted Legal Linguistics” (CAL²) under the auspices of the Heidelberg Academy of Sciences. About forty scholars from Germany, Switzerland, Italy, Poland, Spain and the US brought together their different intellectual and disciplinary perspectives on computational linguistics and legal thinking. Concluding the conference, four legal linguistics experts – two native linguists, two native lawyers – discussed the perspectives and limitations of computer-assisted legal linguistics. Their debate, which this article faithfully reproduces, touches on some of the essential epistemological issues of interdisciplinary research and evidence-based policy, and marks the way forward for legal corpus linguistics.

1 … Juristische Korpuspragmatik – Konferenzbericht
DS 41 (2013), S. 285–288, gemeinsam mit Jana Werner … DOI: 10.37307/j.1868-775X.2013.03.06