Hanjo Hamann / Fachtexte

Publikationen

Auswahl von zwölf Fachtexten, thematisch gruppiert, sortiert von neu nach alt.
→ Auswahl aufheben

12 … Property, Psyche, and the Theory of Tenancy. Independent and Interdependent Lease Law Covenants Through the Lens of Cultural Psychology
J. Prop. Law 9 (2023), S. 223–262 … DOI: 10.37419/JPL.V9.I2.1

11 … Scopus/Scimago: Useless for Studying Legal Research!. An Empirical Assessment of Misclassification Rates in a Popular Scientometric Data Source
R|E 25.7.2022, gemeinsam mit Lill Emmelheinz … DOI: 10.25527/re.2022.02

10 … K Is for Contract―Why Is It, Though? A K’s Study on the Origins, Persistence and Propagation of Legal Konventions
MLR Headnotes 106 (2022), S. 362–390

9 … Rent, Reduction, and Reason. An Incentivized Vignette Survey on the Economic Value of Lease Law Remedies
Stanford Law School, Crown Law Library 28.5.2020

8 … Seven Years of Language & Law. Editors’ Progress Report on the Journal of the International Language & Law Association
JLL 8 (2019), S. 1–8, gemeinsam mit Friedemann Vogel … DOI: 10.14762/jll.2019.001

7 … Computer-Assisted Legal Linguistics. Corpus Analysis as a New Tool for Legal Studies
Law & Soc. Inq. 43 (2018), S. 1340–1363, gemeinsam mit Friedemann Vogel / Isabelle Gauer … DOI: 10.1111/lsi.12305

6 … Evidence-Based Jurisprudence meets Legal Linguistics. Unlikely Blends Made in Germany
BYU L. Rev. 43 (2018), S. 1473–1501, gemeinsam mit Friedemann Vogel … ISSN: 0360-151X

5 … The Fabric of Language and Law. Special Issue of the International Journal of Language & Law
Verlag JLL, Freiburg i.Br. 2017, ISBN 2194-7414 (Online-ISSN) (109 S.), gemeinsam mit Friedemann Vogel … ISBN: 2194-7414 (Online-ISSN)

4 … The Fabric of Language and Law. Towards an International Research Network for Computer Assisted Legal Linguistics (CAL²)
JLL 6 (2017), S. 101–109, gemeinsam mit Friedemann Vogel … DOI: 10.14762/jll.2017.101

3 … Cui Bono, Benefit Corporation? An Experiment Inspired by Social Enterprise Legislation in Germany and the US
RLE 11 (2015), S. 79–110, gemeinsam mit Sven Fischer / Sebastian J. Goerg … DOI: 10.1515/rle-2014-0036 How do barely incentivized norms impact incentive-rich environments? We take social enterprise legislation as a case in point. It establishes rules on behalf of constituencies that have no institutionalized means of enforcing them. By relying primarily on managers' other-regarding concerns whilst leaving corporate incentive structures unaltered, how effective can such legislation be? This question is vital for the ongoing debate about social enterprise forms, as recently introduced in several US states and in British Columbia, Canada. We ran a laboratory experiment with a framing likened to German corporate law which traditionally includes social standards. Our results show that a stakeholder provision, as found in both Germany and the US, cannot overcome material incentives. However, even absent incentives the stakeholder norm does not foster other regarding behavior but slightly inhibits it instead. Our experiment thus illustrates the paramount importance of taking into account both incentives and framing effects when designing institutions. We tentatively discuss potential policy implications for social enterprise legislation and the stakeholder debate.

2 … Unpacking the Board. A Comparative and Empirical Perspective on Groups in Corporate Decision-Making
BBLJ 11 (2014), S. 1–54 … DOI: 10.15779/Z38GC6H

1 … Student Participation in Legal Education in Germany and Europe
GLJ 10 (2009), S. 1095–1112, gemeinsam mit Lisa Rieder … DOI: 10.1017/S2071832200001498