Hanjo Hamann / Fachtexte

Publikationen

Auswahl von 19 Fachtexten, thematisch gruppiert, sortiert von neu nach alt.
→ Auswahl aufheben

19 … Empirische Rechtsforschung in Deutschland. Einblicke von Hanjo Hamann (Interview)
RtL 6 (2023), Nr. 4, S. 4–8 … ISSN: 2625-686X

18 … Property, Psyche, and the Theory of Tenancy. Independent and Interdependent Lease Law Covenants Through the Lens of Cultural Psychology
J. Prop. Law 9 (2023), S. 223–262 … DOI: 10.37419/JPL.V9.I2.1

17 … Scopus/Scimago: Useless for Studying Legal Research!. An Empirical Assessment of Misclassification Rates in a Popular Scientometric Data Source
R|E 25.7.2022, gemeinsam mit Lill Emmelheinz … DOI: 10.25527/re.2022.02

16 … K Is for Contract―Why Is It, Though? A K’s Study on the Origins, Persistence and Propagation of Legal Konventions
MLR Headnotes 106 (2022), S. 362–390

15 … Der freie Zugang zu wissenschaftlicher Information. Rechtswissenschaft
OAnet 1.7.2021, gemeinsam mit Daniel Hürlimann

14 … Rent, Reduction, and Reason. An Incentivized Vignette Survey on the Economic Value of Lease Law Remedies
Stanford Law School, Crown Law Library 28.5.2020

13 … Seven Years of Language & Law. Editors’ Progress Report on the Journal of the International Language & Law Association
JLL 8 (2019), S. 1–8, gemeinsam mit Friedemann Vogel … DOI: 10.14762/jll.2019.001

12 … Computer-Assisted Legal Linguistics. Corpus Analysis as a New Tool for Legal Studies
Law & Soc. Inq. 43 (2018), S. 1340–1363, gemeinsam mit Friedemann Vogel / Isabelle Gauer … DOI: 10.1111/lsi.12305

11 … 70 Jahre Marginalien des deutschen Staatsrechts. Nachschau auf ein vergessenes Kapitel der Nachkriegspublizistik
AöR 143 (2018), S. 282–311 … DOI: 10.1628/aoer-2018-0022

10 … Evidence-Based Jurisprudence meets Legal Linguistics. Unlikely Blends Made in Germany
BYU L. Rev. 43 (2018), S. 1473–1501, gemeinsam mit Friedemann Vogel … ISSN: 0360-151X

9 … The Fabric of Language and Law. Special Issue of the International Journal of Language & Law
Verlag JLL, Freiburg i.Br. 2017, ISBN 2194-7414 (Online-ISSN) (109 S.), gemeinsam mit Friedemann Vogel … ISBN: 2194-7414 (Online-ISSN)

8 … The Fabric of Language and Law. Towards an International Research Network for Computer Assisted Legal Linguistics (CAL²)
JLL 6 (2017), S. 101–109, gemeinsam mit Friedemann Vogel … DOI: 10.14762/jll.2017.101

7 … Text, Kontext und Textualismus in der juristischen Methodenlehre. Frank Easterbrook neu gelesen und übersetzt
S. 135–150 in: Vogel (Hrsg.), Recht ist kein Text. Studien zur Sprachlosigkeit im verfassten Rechtsstaat, Verlag Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 2017 … DOI: 10.3790/978-3-428-55247-4

6 … Offene Wissenschaft. Wie kann sich Freies Wissen weiter entwickeln? (Interview)
WMde-Blog 28.6.2017

5 … Cui Bono, Benefit Corporation? An Experiment Inspired by Social Enterprise Legislation in Germany and the US
RLE 11 (2015), S. 79–110, gemeinsam mit Sven Fischer / Sebastian J. Goerg … DOI: 10.1515/rle-2014-0036

4 … Evidenzbasierte Jurisprudenz. Methoden empirischer Forschung und ihr Erkenntniswert für das Recht am Beispiel des Gesellschaftsrechts
Verlag Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2014, ISBN 978-3-16-153322-8 (414 S.) … DOI: 10.1628/978-3-16-159731-2

3 … Unpacking the Board. A Comparative and Empirical Perspective on Groups in Corporate Decision-Making
BBLJ 11 (2014), S. 1–54 … DOI: 10.15779/Z38GC6H Collegial decision-making is relevant for a host of legal questions and in particular for corporate law. What do we know about its empirical effects? Less than we could. As of yet, pertinent review articles usually (1) assume rather than analyze how much the law actually mandates collegial decision-making, (2) rely mostly on “classical” studies of decision-making or those from behavioral economics, while underrating a century’s worth of previous empirical research, and (3) review the evidence anecdotally with little regard for the robustness of each study’s findings. As a consequence, scholars from corporate law and economics even today rely on theories and evidence which were disproved years ago. The present paper is a remedy. It combines a thorough comparative analysis of corporate statutes with a comprehensive research of empirical evidence, resulting in an assessment of the robust empirical effects of collegial decision-making. Finding that groups tend to deteriorate decision quality and exacerbate cognitive biases, this paper calls upon corporate law to design institutional remedies. Knowing more about these empirical effects will help scholars to identify and eliminate faulty arguments, and thereby improve governance policy and the legal discourse as a whole.

2 … Student Participation in Legal Education in Germany and Europe
GLJ 10 (2009), S. 1095–1112, gemeinsam mit Lisa Rieder … DOI: 10.1017/S2071832200001498

1 … Kurioses im Paragrafendschungel. Interview
NJW 62 (2009), Nr. 9, S. XIV–XVI … ISSN: 0341-1915