Hanjo Hamann / Fachtexte

Publikationen

Auswahl von zwölf Fachtexten, thematisch gruppiert, sortiert von neu nach alt.
→ Auswahl aufheben

12 … Empirische Rechtsforschung in Deutschland. Einblicke von Hanjo Hamann (Interview)
RtL 6 (2023), Nr. 4, S. 4–8 … ISSN: 2625-686X

11 … Property, Psyche, and the Theory of Tenancy. Independent and Interdependent Lease Law Covenants Through the Lens of Cultural Psychology
J. Prop. Law 9 (2023), S. 223–262 … DOI: 10.37419/JPL.V9.I2.1

10 … Scopus/Scimago: Useless for Studying Legal Research!. An Empirical Assessment of Misclassification Rates in a Popular Scientometric Data Source
R|E 25.7.2022, gemeinsam mit Lill Emmelheinz … DOI: 10.25527/re.2022.02

9 … K Is for Contract―Why Is It, Though? A K’s Study on the Origins, Persistence and Propagation of Legal Konventions
MLR Headnotes 106 (2022), S. 362–390

8 … Der freie Zugang zu wissenschaftlicher Information. Rechtswissenschaft
OAnet 1.7.2021, gemeinsam mit Daniel Hürlimann

7 … 70 Jahre Marginalien des deutschen Staatsrechts. Nachschau auf ein vergessenes Kapitel der Nachkriegspublizistik
AöR 143 (2018), S. 282–311 … DOI: 10.1628/aoer-2018-0022

6 … Evidence-Based Jurisprudence meets Legal Linguistics. Unlikely Blends Made in Germany
BYU L. Rev. 43 (2018), S. 1473–1501, gemeinsam mit Friedemann Vogel … ISSN: 0360-151X

5 … Text, Kontext und Textualismus in der juristischen Methodenlehre. Frank Easterbrook neu gelesen und übersetzt
S. 135–150 in: Vogel (Hrsg.), Recht ist kein Text. Studien zur Sprachlosigkeit im verfassten Rechtsstaat, Verlag Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 2017 … DOI: 10.3790/978-3-428-55247-4

4 … Offene Wissenschaft. Wie kann sich Freies Wissen weiter entwickeln? (Interview)
WMde-Blog 28.6.2017

3 … Unpacking the Board. A Comparative and Empirical Perspective on Groups in Corporate Decision-Making
BBLJ 11 (2014), S. 1–54 … DOI: 10.15779/Z38GC6H Collegial decision-making is relevant for a host of legal questions and in particular for corporate law. What do we know about its empirical effects? Less than we could. As of yet, pertinent review articles usually (1) assume rather than analyze how much the law actually mandates collegial decision-making, (2) rely mostly on “classical” studies of decision-making or those from behavioral economics, while underrating a century’s worth of previous empirical research, and (3) review the evidence anecdotally with little regard for the robustness of each study’s findings. As a consequence, scholars from corporate law and economics even today rely on theories and evidence which were disproved years ago. The present paper is a remedy. It combines a thorough comparative analysis of corporate statutes with a comprehensive research of empirical evidence, resulting in an assessment of the robust empirical effects of collegial decision-making. Finding that groups tend to deteriorate decision quality and exacerbate cognitive biases, this paper calls upon corporate law to design institutional remedies. Knowing more about these empirical effects will help scholars to identify and eliminate faulty arguments, and thereby improve governance policy and the legal discourse as a whole.

2 … Student Participation in Legal Education in Germany and Europe
GLJ 10 (2009), S. 1095–1112, gemeinsam mit Lisa Rieder … DOI: 10.1017/S2071832200001498

1 … Kurioses im Paragrafendschungel. Interview
NJW 62 (2009), Nr. 9, S. XIV–XVI … ISSN: 0341-1915